Skip to content

Conversation

cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Apr 25, 2020

These are semantically the same, but find_map() is more concise.

These are semantically the same, but `find_map()` is more concise.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Hm I think the CI failure here is spurious, and this looks good to me, so @bors r+ rollup

(Looks like GHA passed so seems good enough for me).

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 25, 2020

📌 Commit 4282776 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 25, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2020
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#69041 (proc_macro: Stabilize `Span::resolved_at` and `Span::located_at`)
 - rust-lang#69813 (Implement BitOr and BitOrAssign for the NonZero integer types)
 - rust-lang#70712 (stabilize BTreeMap::remove_entry)
 - rust-lang#71168 (Deprecate `{Box,Rc,Arc}::into_raw_non_null`)
 - rust-lang#71544 (Replace filter_map().next() calls with find_map())
 - rust-lang#71545 (Fix comment in docstring example for Error::kind)
 - rust-lang#71548 (Add missing Send and Sync impls for linked list Cursor and CursorMut.)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 9709785 into rust-lang:master Apr 25, 2020
@cuviper cuviper deleted the filter_map_next branch May 30, 2020 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants